Gun Related News Stories
California Sheriffs Oppose New Gun Control Legislation - September 3, 2016
Some of Southern California's most vocal gun rights advocates wear badges.
Riverside County Sheriff Stan Sniff and San Bernardino County Sheriff John McMahon have consistently opposed new gun control legislation. So does Orange County Sheriff Sandra Hutchens.
In a telephone interview, McMahon said more gun control rules are not the best way to preventing gun violence.
"I generally oppose any legislation that puts any more restrictions or control on citizens having an ability to possess firearms," said McMahon, who has been sheriff since 2012. "We still have people running around with guns that arenâ€™t supposed to have them."
In emailed responses to questions, Sniff wrote that while the courts "have long held that reasonable restrictions to the Second Amendment are both constitutional and also protect our communities. Many proposed firearms control bills are very poorly thought out, hastily drafted without appropriate expert input, and incorrectly proffered to the public as 'making things safer' in our communities."
Glock And Remington Sue MA AG To Stop Investigation - September 1, 2016
Attorney General Maura Healey has launched a sweeping investigation into possible safety problems involving guns manufactured by at least two major companies, Remington and Glock, according to lawsuits filed by both firms, which are fighting Healey's efforts.
The lawsuits reveal that this year, Healey invoked her powers under the state's consumer protection law to demand that both companies turn over a wide range of documents, including safety related complaints from customers and the companies' responses.
The investigation is the second prominent battle Healey is waging against the gun industry. In July, she angered gun owners and manufacturers when she moved to bar the sale of military style rifles that have been altered slightly to evade the stateâ€™s ban on assault weapons.
In her newly disclosed legal action, Healey argues Glock firearms are "prone to accidental discharge" and makes clear in court papers that she is concerned the company may have been warned about the problem and failed to act.
Responding to Glock's lawsuit, she referenced news stories about a sheriff's deputy accidentally firing a Glock pistol in San Francisco's Hall of Justice, a Los Angeles police officer who was paralyzed from the waist down after his 3 year old son accidentally fired his Glock pistol, and a Massachusetts man who was dancing at a July 4th party when his Glock handgun fired while it was in his pocket.
ATF Clarifies Statement On Nitrocellulose Reclassification - September 1, 2016
The internet is a blaze with articles declaring that ATF just banned ammunition sales as a result of a June 2016 Explosives Newsletter; however, it isn't exactly true (at least, not anymore). The ATF publishes newsletters which provide insight into complex subjects, shifting policies, and guidance on ATF's plans to enforce regulations. In the June 2016 Explosives Newsletter ATF 'clarified' that Nitrocellulose is a high explosive subject to the requirements of the Safe Explosives Act and other laws governing the sale, storage, and transport of high explosives. You may be thinking â€“ "Well great but what is Nitrocellulose and what does that have to do with ammo?"
The answer to that is simple â€“ most ammunition used in the United States is powered by smokeless gunpowders. Unlike black powder which is a fairly straight forward mix of chemicals, smokeless powders are proprietary blends of different chemicals each unique to the manufacturer. Unique that is except for the base chemical â€“ Nitrocellulose.
Federal Appeals Court Upholds Gun Ban On Medical Marijuana Users - September 1, 2016
As marijuana is slowly legalized both for recreational and medicinal purposes in a variety of states across the United States, those states' laws sometimes come head to head with already existing federal legislation. These clashes are problematic, and they can create legal gray areas that courts then need to weigh in on. That's exactly what happened recently in a federal appeals court in San Francisco, when the court ruled that the federal government's prohibition on medical marijuana users obtaining a firearm does not violate the Second Amendment.
The case was sparked by a Nevada woman named S. Rowan Wilson, who in 2011 tried to purchase a gun. She had a medical marijuana card, which was legal given that Nevada had legalized medicinal weed over a decade before. The store refused to sell her the gun, because in 1968 Congress passed a law prohibiting anyone who used illegal drugs from obtaining a firearm. While Wilson wasn't exactly using an illegal drug, at least under Nevada law, marijuana is still illegal under federal law. That's what makes this case a perfect example of the confusing interplay between state and federal law when it comes to marijuana, yet Wilson was upset by what she saw as a violation of her Second Amendment rights.
Judge Upholds Cleveland Gun Registry Strikes Down Other Gun Laws - August 25, 2016
A Cuyahoga County judge ruled that some of Cleveland's new gun control laws violate the state constitution, but left intact a controversial gun offender registry that drew the ire of gun-rights groups.
Common Pleas Judge Shirley Strickland-Saffold ruled Monday that three of Cleveland's laws enacted in April 2015 violated a state law that gives state legislators preemptive control over gun laws, including a provision that allowed police officers to confiscate guns.
The ruling came after Ohioans for Concealed Carry filed a constitutional challenge against the ordinance just days after it was passed by city council.
Jeff Gravas, president and founder of the concealed carry group, said that the ruling corroborates his organization's claim that the ordinance was passed in the face of a prior Ohio Supreme Court ruling against the city six years ago.
No Right To Concealed Carry Per 9th Circuit Court - August 16, 2016
At 1:24:41 PM PDT on August 15, 2016, 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Chief Judge Thomas issued the following Order in the combined concealed carry cases of Peruta v. San Diego and Richards v. Prieto:
Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS) The full court was advised of appellants petitions for full court en banc rehearing (Docket Entry Nos.  and ). A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc by the full court. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of full court en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35. Accordingly, the petitions for full court en banc rehearing (Docket Entry Nos.  and ) are denied. In No. 10-56971, appellants motion for leave to file a reply brief (Docket Entry No. ) is denied as moot.
Olympic Sponsors Refuse Team USA Shooter Sponsorship - August 12, 2016
When Team USA's Kim Rhode won a bronze medal in skeet shooting Friday, she claimed a piece of Olympic history: the 37-year-old Californian became the first woman to take the podium in six straight Olympics.
Landing a big name sponsor might be the bigger feat. In the year leading up to Rio 2016, Rhode's agent Patrick Quinn pitched her to around 20 companies that back the Olympics. None were convinced.
"The big mystery is how someone like Kim isn't part of the Coca-Cola, Procter & Gamble, and the Olympics sponsor push," Quinn said by phone from Chicago. "It would be nice to have an Olympic sponsor recognize the magnitude of her accomplishment."
Coca-Cola Co. didn't respond to a request for comment, and Procter & Gamble Co.'s spokesperson Damon Jones said in an email the company receives hundreds of sponsorship requests so it must be selective. Rhode and other shooters on Team USA think the reason they're passed over is obvious. The rise in gun violence and mass shootings in the US have attached a stigma to shooting as a sport, they say. So while companies like Winchester, Beretta and Otis Technology support Rhode, she doesn't have a single sponsor from outside the firearm industry.
New Jersey Lawmakers Move To Invalidate Governor Order On Concealed Carry - August 8, 2016
Lawmakers moved closer Monday toward invalidating regulations proposed by Governor Christie's administration that would allow more people to legally carry a handgun in New Jersey.
The proposed regulation would allow gun permits to be granted to people who can demonstrate a 'serious threat' and need to carry a firearm. The state's current standard only allows permits to be issued if a person can cite a specific threat or earlier attack.
While lawmakers do not directly vote on administrative rules, if both the Senate and Assembly approve a resolution rejecting the regulations, the new rules can be blocked.
Assistant Attorney General Stephen Finkel, however, told the Senate Law and Public Safety Committee that his office was never officially notified of the Legislature's attempt to overturn proposed gun permit 'justifiable needs' regulations proposed by the state police in March.
New ATF Director Wants Gun Database - August 1, 2016
Deputy Director Thomas Brandon, head of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) appeared on CBS's Sunday Morning television show, complaining that his agency is 'a small agency with a big job' and that he really needs more agents and more money to do that job.
What he would really like, however, is a computerized database of all gun purchases made by every buyer and seller in the country:
"There's a lot of things that donâ€™t make sense.â€¦ Would [having such a database at the ATF] be efficient and effective? Absolutely. Would the taxpayers benefit with [improved] public safety? Absolutely. Are we allowed to do it? No."
Brandon took over the agency in April 2015 after Todd Jones bailed out following the agency's failed attempt to ban ammunition for the popular AR-15 rifle. Jones had taken over the agency after Kenneth Melson bailed out in 2011 following the implosion of the ATF's Fast and Furious gun-walking scandal.
AP Poll Americans Disapprove of Obama's Handling of Gun Laws - July 23, 2016
An Associated Press poll released July 23 shows that 59 percent of Americans disapprove of President Obama's handling of gun laws, and an even greater majority, 62 percent, believe owning a gun makes people safer by 'preventing them from becoming victims of crime.'
The poll also shows that 53 percent of Americans support national reciprocity for concealed carry permits. National reciprocity renders a concealed carry permit issued in one state valid in every state. An overwhelming majority of respondents also said a 'high priority' for law enforcement should be 'cracking down on people who own guns illegally' and 'cracking down on people who sell guns illegally.'
AR500 Recalls Level 3 Body Armor - July 21, 2016
According to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, AR500 is recalling its Level III body armor.
"This recall involves AR500 Armor Level III body armor, including chest plates, side plates and ABS panels. The black, steel-core body armor is rated for protection against rifle calibers up to 7.62X51 M80 Ball (.308) at 2,800 feet per second. AR500 Armor is printed on a white label on the back side of the armor. Only AR500 Level III body armor with the manufacture date code of February 2016 and March 2016 are included in the recall."
If you have one of these products you can contact AR500 or learn more about the recall below.
AR500 Armor toll-free at 844-887-8824 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. PT Monday through Friday, email at support@AR500armor.com or online at www.ar500armor.com and click on 'Safety Recall' for more information.
Massachusetts Attorney General Bans All AR-15 Sales In The State - July 20, 2016
After the usual 'assault rifles' are 'weapon of war' used by 'mass murderers' anti-AR agitprop, Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey dropped this bombshell at The Boston Globe.
"The Massachusetts assault weapons ban mirrors the federal ban Congress allowed to expire in 2004. It prohibits the sale of specific weapons like the Colt AR-15 and AK-47 and explicitly bans 'copies or duplicates' of those weapons. But gun manufacturers have taken it upon themselves to define what a 'copy' or 'duplicate' weapon is. They market 'state compliant' copycat versions of their assault weapons to Massachusetts buyers. They sell guns without a flash suppressor or folding or telescoping stock, for example, small tweaks that do nothing to limit the lethalness of the weapon.
That will end now. On Wednesday, we are sending a directive to all gun manufacturers and dealers that makes clear that the sale of these copycat assault weapons is illegal in Massachusetts. With this directive, we will ensure we get the full protection intended when lawmakers enacted our assault weapons ban, not the watered-down version of those protections offered by gun manufacturers.
The directive specifically outlines two tests to determine what constitutes a 'copy' or 'duplicate' of a prohibited weapon. If a gun's operating system is essentially the same as that of a banned weapon, or if the gun has components that are interchangeable with those of a banned weapon, it's a 'copy' or 'duplicate,' and it is illegal. Assault weapons prohibited under our laws cannot be altered in any way to make their sale or possession legal in Massachusetts.
California Governor Signs Four Anti-Gun Bills Rejects Others - July 1, 2016
Gov. Jerry Brown this morning took swift action on a sweeping package of bills designed to keep the state's residents safer from deadly gun violence, signing a series of new restrictions on firearms owners into law while vetoing others.
Brown endorsed legislation that will require background checks to purchase ammunition, ban possession of high-capacity magazines and close a loophole in the state's existing assault weapons ban by prohibiting long guns with "bullet buttons" that make it easier for shooters to swap magazines.
Supreme Court Upholds Firearm Ban For Domestic Abusers - June 27, 2016
The court upheld a federal ban on gun ownership for any citizen convicted of domestic assault.
The ruling came one week after the Senate rejected a series of gun control laws, including legislation to prevent suspected terrorists from buying weapons.
In a 6-2 decision, the court rejected arguments from two Maine men, who said their misdemeanor convictions weren't severe enough to keep them from owning firearms. Both men were charged with illegal gun possession due to their prior convictions.
Networks Stacked Orlando Coverage 8 To 1 In Favor Of Gun Control - June 24, 2016
A media watchdog's analysis of the "Big Three networks" in the wake of the June 12 terrorist attack in Orlando, Florida, shows news coverage was dramatically stacked against gun rights advocates.
Media Research Center followed political coverage of ABC, NBC, CBS for one week after 29 year old security guard killed 49 and wounded 53 others at Pulse, a gay nightclub, with a semi-automatic weapon. The nonprofit organization observed an 8 to 1 imbalance of coverage in favor of new gun-control measures.
The group's extensive study covered 47 gun policy stories (41 full segments, 6 anchor read briefs), and 10 stories that mentioned gun policy on the networks' morning and evening shows.
U.S. Appeals Court Rejects Gunmakers Claim On Silencer - June 22, 2016
A U.S. appeals court on Tuesday upheld a lower court's ruling that a prototype rifle design by Sig Sauer featured a built-in silencer that would make it subject to tougher federal restrictions on its sale and higher taxes.
Sig Sauer, which produced the semi-automatic rifle believed to be used in the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history, had challenged a 2013 ruling by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, that the prototype not yet released for sale would be subject to a $200 transfer fee for each weapon sold due to the silencer.
The privately held company, based in Newington, New Hampshire, argued that the device on the end of the weapon was not intended to serve as a silencer but rather was a "muzzle brake," which can reduce recoil. Classifying the device as a silencer would subject the gun to stiffer federal requirements including stricter limits on record keeping and markings, which would result in there being "no market" for the gun, Sig Sauer said in court papers.
Supreme Court Refuses To Hear Connecticut Assault Weapons Ban Case - June 20, 2016
The Supreme Court on Monday refused to hear a Second Amendment challenge to a Connecticut law banning many semiautomatic rifles. The law, enacted in 2013 in the wake of the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., made it a crime to sell or possess the firearms, which critics call assault weapons.
The decision not to hear the case, not long after the mass shooting in Orlando, Fla., does not set a Supreme Court precedent. But it is part of a trend in which the justices have given at least tacit approval to broad gun-control laws in states and localities that choose to enact them.
Breaking: 9th Circuit Rules Concealed Carry Is Not A Right - June 9, 2016
A ruling with the potential to vastly expand the number of California residents permitted to carry concealed weapons in public was overturned by a federal appeals court.
The U.S. Court of Appeals in San Francisco on Thursday set aside a three-judge panelâ€™s 2014 ruling that San Diego Countyâ€™s process for determining who qualifies for a permit to carry a concealed weapon violates the constitutional right to bear arms. The decision is a loss for gun rights advocates including the National Rifle Association who have attacked some of the nationâ€™s strictest public-carry laws.
South Carolina Legislation Passes Georgia Reciprocity - June 3, 2016
A new South Carolina law awaiting Gov. Nikki Haley's signature would help Georgia gun owners travel over the state border more easily.
South Carolina has a stricter process than Georgia for getting a concealed weapons permit. It requires gun training. Because Georgia doesn't, the state's carry permits haven't been valid in South Carolina.
That's been a real pain for some gun owners in Augusta. Gun store and range owner Buddy Lichty lives there, but crosses the border all the time. Often he goes for cheaper gas.
Federal Court Say Washington DC Must Allow Concealed Carry For Retired Correction Officer - June 3, 2016
Four former prison guards who were barred from carrying concealed guns despite a 2004 federal law that gave off duty and retired law enforcement officers the right to pack heat won a landmark court victory on Thursday.
In a 2-1 decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Washington D.C. Circuit held that the city's Department of Corrections improperly barred the men from carrying concealed firearms, saying the 2004 Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act guaranteed their right. The court rejected the city's argument that the law does not apply to corrections officers because they lack arresting authority.
"[Congress] left no discretion for a state to revise the historical record of an individual qualified law enforcement officer," read the majority opinion.