| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
1 | AN ACT concerning safety.
| |||||||||||||||||||||
2 | Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
| |||||||||||||||||||||
3 | represented in the General Assembly:
| |||||||||||||||||||||
4 | Section 5. The Illinois Solid Waste Management Act is | |||||||||||||||||||||
5 | amended by changing Section 2 and by adding Section 4.1 as | |||||||||||||||||||||
6 | follows:
| |||||||||||||||||||||
7 | (415 ILCS 20/2) (from Ch. 111 1/2, par. 7052)
| |||||||||||||||||||||
8 | Sec. 2. Public Policy. (a) The General Assembly finds:
| |||||||||||||||||||||
9 | (1) that current solid waste disposal practices are not | |||||||||||||||||||||
10 | adequate to
address the needs of many metropolitan areas in | |||||||||||||||||||||
11 | Illinois;
| |||||||||||||||||||||
12 | (2) that the generation of solid waste is increasing while | |||||||||||||||||||||
13 | landfill
capacity is decreasing;
| |||||||||||||||||||||
14 | (3) that siting of new landfills, transfer stations, | |||||||||||||||||||||
15 | incinerators,
recycling facilities, or other solid waste | |||||||||||||||||||||
16 | management facilities and the
expansion of existing facilities | |||||||||||||||||||||
17 | is very difficult due to the public
concern and competition | |||||||||||||||||||||
18 | with other land uses for suitable sites;
| |||||||||||||||||||||
19 | (4) that more effective and efficient management of solid | |||||||||||||||||||||
20 | waste is
needed in a manner that promotes economic development, | |||||||||||||||||||||
21 | protects the
environment and public health and safety, and | |||||||||||||||||||||
22 | allows the most practical and
beneficial use of the material | |||||||||||||||||||||
23 | and energy values of solid waste;
|
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | (5) that state government policy and programs should be | ||||||
2 | developed to
assist local governments and private industry in | ||||||
3 | seeking solutions to solid
waste management problems;
| ||||||
4 | (6) that the purchase of products or supplies made from | ||||||
5 | recycled
materials by public agencies in the State will divert | ||||||
6 | significant
quantities of waste from landfills, reduce | ||||||
7 | disposal costs and stimulate
recycling markets, thereby | ||||||
8 | encouraging the further use of recycled
materials and educating | ||||||
9 | the public about the utility and availability of
such | ||||||
10 | materials;
| ||||||
11 | (7) that there are wastes for which combustion would not | ||||||
12 | provide
practical energy recovery or practical volume | ||||||
13 | reduction, which cannot be
reasonably recycled or reused and | ||||||
14 | which have reduced environmental threat
because they are | ||||||
15 | non-putrescible, homogeneous and do not contain free
liquids. | ||||||
16 | Such wastes bear a real and substantial difference under the
| ||||||
17 | purposes of the Illinois Solid Waste Management Act from solid | ||||||
18 | wastes for
which combustion would provide practical energy | ||||||
19 | recovery or practical
volume reduction, which can be reasonably | ||||||
20 | recycled or reused, or which are
putrescible, non-homogeneous | ||||||
21 | or contain free liquids;
| ||||||
22 | (8) since it is the policy of the State as set forth in the
| ||||||
23 | Environmental Protection Act to assure that contaminants | ||||||
24 | discharged into
the atmosphere or waters of the State are given | ||||||
25 | the degree of treatment or
control necessary to prevent | ||||||
26 | pollution, that wastes generated as a result
of removing |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | contaminants from the air, water or land bear a real and
| ||||||
2 | substantial difference from other wastes in that the generation | ||||||
3 | of wastes
containing pollution treatment residuals can improve | ||||||
4 | the environment in
Illinois and should be encouraged;
| ||||||
5 | (9) since it is the policy of the State as set forth in the
| ||||||
6 | Environmental Protection Act to promote conservation of | ||||||
7 | natural resources
and minimize environmental damage by | ||||||
8 | encouraging and effecting recycling
and reuse of waste | ||||||
9 | materials, that wastes from recycling, reclamation or
reuse | ||||||
10 | processes designed to remove contaminants so as to render such | ||||||
11 | wastes
reusable or wastes received at a landfill and recycled | ||||||
12 | through an Agency
permitted process bear a real and substantial | ||||||
13 | difference from wastes not
resulting from or subject to such | ||||||
14 | recycling, reclamation, or reuse and that
encouraging such | ||||||
15 | recycling, reclamation or reuse furthers the purposes of
the | ||||||
16 | Illinois Solid Waste Management Act;
| ||||||
17 | (10) that there are over 300 landfills in Illinois which | ||||||
18 | are permitted to
accept only demolition or construction debris | ||||||
19 | or landscape waste, the vast
majority of which accept less than | ||||||
20 | 10,000 cubic yards per year. By
themselves these wastes pose | ||||||
21 | only a minimal hazard to the environment when
landfilled in | ||||||
22 | compliance with regulatory requirements in an
Agency-permitted | ||||||
23 | site without commingling with other wastes and, as such,
| ||||||
24 | landfills receiving only such wastes bear a real and | ||||||
25 | substantial difference
from landfills receiving wastes which | ||||||
26 | are
commingled. Disposal of these wastes in landfills permitted |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | for municipal
wastes uses up increasingly scarce capacity for | ||||||
2 | garbage, general household
and commercial waste. It is the | ||||||
3 | policy of the State to encourage disposal
of these wastes in | ||||||
4 | separate landfills.
| ||||||
5 | (b) It is the purpose of this Act to reduce reliance on | ||||||
6 | land disposal of
solid waste, to encourage and promote | ||||||
7 | alternative means of managing solid
waste, and to assist local | ||||||
8 | governments with solid waste planning and
management. In the | ||||||
9 | interest of the public health, safety, and welfare, in order to | ||||||
10 | conserve energy and natural resources, and to maintain and | ||||||
11 | enhance job creation, and after consideration of the technical | ||||||
12 | and economic feasibility, it is the policy of the State of | ||||||
13 | Illinois to establish a comprehensive Statewide program for | ||||||
14 | solid waste management which will preserve or enhance the | ||||||
15 | quality of air, water, and land resources in accordance with | ||||||
16 | the following preferred In furtherance of those aims, while | ||||||
17 | recognizing that landfills
will continue to be necessary, this | ||||||
18 | Act establishes the
following waste management hierarchy, in | ||||||
19 | descending order of preference,
as State policy:
| ||||||
20 | (1) volume reduction at the source;
| ||||||
21 | (2) recycling and reuse;
| ||||||
22 | (3) recycling; combustion with energy recovery ;
| ||||||
23 | (4) composting or biological treatment; combustion for | ||||||
24 | volume reduction;
| ||||||
25 | (5) recovering energy; and | ||||||
26 | (6) disposal in landfill facilities or other approved |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | disposal methods .
| ||||||
2 | (Source: P.A. 85-1440.)
| ||||||
3 | (415 ILCS 20/4.1 new) | ||||||
4 | Sec. 4.1. State resources management plan. On or before | ||||||
5 | December 1, 2016, the Illinois Sustainable Technology Center of | ||||||
6 | the Prairie Research Institute at the University of Illinois | ||||||
7 | shall publish a Statewide resource management plan, and shall | ||||||
8 | update the plan every 5 years. The Illinois Sustainable | ||||||
9 | Technology Center may obtain assistance from outside experts to | ||||||
10 | assist in the preparation of the plan. The plan shall be | ||||||
11 | developed with the assistance of a broad-based advisory | ||||||
12 | committee. Funding for the plan shall be taken from the | ||||||
13 | Illinois Solid Waste Management Fund. The plan shall include | ||||||
14 | the following information: | ||||||
15 | (a) An estimate, with 2014 as a base year, of the | ||||||
16 | amount and composition of waste disposed on a Statewide and | ||||||
17 | per capita basis, and development of a database of | ||||||
18 | permitted facilities and non-permitted facilities that | ||||||
19 | must notify the Agency, including landfills, garbage | ||||||
20 | transfer stations, landscape waste transfer stations, | ||||||
21 | composting sites, landscape waste land application sites, | ||||||
22 | construction and demolition debris recycling facilities, | ||||||
23 | and recycling facilities that process recyclables from | ||||||
24 | residential or commercial generators. In addition, an | ||||||
25 | estimate of the overall waste generation rate and how that |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | waste is managed after generation (amount reused, | ||||||
2 | recycled, composted, and disposed) as of 2014. It is | ||||||
3 | expected that the Department of Commerce and Economic | ||||||
4 | Opportunity waste characterization study conducted in 2014 | ||||||
5 | will form the basis for this Section of the State plan. The | ||||||
6 | results of the 2014 Department of Commerce and Economic | ||||||
7 | Opportunity study should be compared to the 2009 study to | ||||||
8 | evaluate trends in composition of waste and material being | ||||||
9 | disposed. This comparison should lead to conclusions | ||||||
10 | regarding recommendations for diversion programs. It is | ||||||
11 | also recommended that the 2014 study be used by counties | ||||||
12 | when preparing their 5-year updates to develop or enhance | ||||||
13 | local programs to capture and divert materials identified | ||||||
14 | in the 2014 study. | ||||||
15 | (b) A common methodology for counties to use in | ||||||
16 | determining their
annual recycling and composting rate. | ||||||
17 | Included shall be a
recommendation that county plans | ||||||
18 | include identification of
facilities (at a minimum the name | ||||||
19 | of facility, geographic
location, and type of facility) | ||||||
20 | that accept recyclables and
organic material for | ||||||
21 | recycling, composting, or digestion from
the county, and | ||||||
22 | that this information be used to update and
augment the | ||||||
23 | database of facilities developed as part of the
State plan. | ||||||
24 | (c) A common methodology for counties to use in | ||||||
25 | determining their
annual waste disposal rate. Included | ||||||
26 | shall be a recommendation
that county plans include |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | identification of facilities (at a
minimum the name of the | ||||||
2 | facility, geographic location, and type
of facility) that | ||||||
3 | accept for transfer or final disposal
municipal waste from | ||||||
4 | the county, and that this information be
used to update and | ||||||
5 | augment the database of facilities
developed as part of the | ||||||
6 | State plan. | ||||||
7 | (d) Source reduction, reuse, recycling, and composting | ||||||
8 | programs
that are applicable to counties with a population | ||||||
9 | of 200,000 or more. Specific recommendations should be | ||||||
10 | developed for residential programs (single family and | ||||||
11 | multi-family), commercial programs, and construction and | ||||||
12 | demolition debris programs. Each recommendation shall | ||||||
13 | include an estimate of the cost to implement the program, | ||||||
14 | how it will be funded, and an estimated timeframe for | ||||||
15 | implementation. | ||||||
16 | (e) Source reduction, reuse, recycling, and composting | ||||||
17 | programs that are applicable to counties with a population | ||||||
18 | of less than 200,000. Specific recommendations should be | ||||||
19 | developed for residential programs (single and | ||||||
20 | multi-family), commercial programs and construction and | ||||||
21 | demolition debris programs. Each recommendation shall | ||||||
22 | include an estimate of the cost to implement the program, | ||||||
23 | how it will be funded, and an estimated timeframe for the | ||||||
24 | implementation. | ||||||
25 | (f) A template for a 5-year plan update that can be | ||||||
26 | used by counties when submitting their 5-year updates to |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | the Agency. | ||||||
2 | (g) Education and public outreach programs that are | ||||||
3 | applicable to all counties. This should include an overall | ||||||
4 | education campaign strategy for counties (how to define the | ||||||
5 | target audience, what media to use, and how to allocate | ||||||
6 | resources), and development of an updated education | ||||||
7 | toolkit with sample flyers, press releases, radio ads, | ||||||
8 | recycling guidelines for recyclables, composting | ||||||
9 | guidelines for food scrap collection, website banners, and | ||||||
10 | similar materials. | ||||||
11 | (h) An assessment of the Department of Commerce and | ||||||
12 | Economic Opportunity waste characterization study | ||||||
13 | conducted in 2014 to form the basis of setting realistic | ||||||
14 | diversion goals over specified periods of time through | ||||||
15 | implementation of the methods and programs identified in | ||||||
16 | the State plan, where diversion goals will be determined | ||||||
17 | based on: (1) landfill disposal volumes to account for | ||||||
18 | source reduction and reuse, and (2) economically viable | ||||||
19 | commodity markets available to account for recyclable | ||||||
20 | materials. | ||||||
21 | The State goal is to meet diversion rates of 40% by 2020, | ||||||
22 | 45% diversion by 2025, and 50% diversion by 2030 in counties | ||||||
23 | with a population over 200,000 (as of 2010 census); 30%, 35%, | ||||||
24 | and 40% respectively in counties with a population of 200,000 | ||||||
25 | or less. | ||||||
26 | The State plan shall also detail the specific |
| |||||||
| |||||||
1 | responsibilities of the counties regarding implementation of | ||||||
2 | the plan, and identify the future role the Agency, the | ||||||
3 | Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity, and other | ||||||
4 | State agencies have in assisting counties and the State to | ||||||
5 | achieve the goals outlined in the State plan. The State plan | ||||||
6 | should also provide a vision with recommended practices that | ||||||
7 | may include residential curbside programs, voluntary industry | ||||||
8 | initiatives, public/private partnerships, consumer education, | ||||||
9 | product stewardship, and extended producer responsibility, | ||||||
10 | disposal bans, mandatory recycling, zero waste approaches, and | ||||||
11 | State government procurement, from which policy makers may | ||||||
12 | consider what proposed programs may have merit for | ||||||
13 | implementation in Illinois. The evaluation of which programs or | ||||||
14 | practices have merit should be conducted pursuant to paragraph | ||||||
15 | (4) of subsection (c) of Section 4 of the Solid Waste Planning | ||||||
16 | and Recycling Act which requires "an evaluation of the | ||||||
17 | environmental, energy, life cycle cost, and economic | ||||||
18 | advantages and disadvantages" of the proposed programs. In | ||||||
19 | addition, the State plan may include recommendations to | ||||||
20 | Congress, such as product labeling, that will benefit State | ||||||
21 | diversion plans.
|