SECTION 1.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a) California is home to more Native American and Alaska Native people than any other state in the country. There are approximately 110 federally recognized tribes in California and 81 entities petitioning for recognition. Federally recognized tribes have a unique government-to-government relationship with local, state, and federal entities, and are recognized as sovereign nations. Tribes can create their own laws, governmental structure, and enrollment or membership rules for the land and citizens of their nation.
(b) California has the fifth largest caseload of missing and murdered Indigenous women and people. Nationwide, more than four in five Native American and Alaska Native women have experienced violence in their lifetime, and more than one in three have in the last year. One in 130 Native American children are likely to go missing each year. Indigenous women go missing and are murdered at rates higher than any other ethnic group in the United States. Nearly one-half of all indigenous women have been raped, beaten, or stalked by an intimate partner. LGBTQ+ Native Americans and people who identify as “two-spirit” people within tribal communities are also often the targets of violence.
(c) California Indian tribes retain the inherent authority to self-govern, including the authority to enact laws that govern their lands.
(d) Approximately 26 tribal governments in the state have exercised their inherent authority by establishing law enforcement agencies to maintain public safety on Indian lands. Additionally, tribes have exercised their inherent authority by establishing 22 tribal courts statewide, serving approximately 40 tribes.
(e) Federal law requires certain states, including the State of California, to enforce state criminal laws on Indian lands in those states, but does not provide adequate resources to the selected states or the tribes within those states for public safety.
(f) Thirteen states and the federal government provide tribal law enforcement authority to enforce state or federal law if tribal officers meet qualifications
delineated in the state and federal authorizing legislation and regulations. Twenty-one of the 27 tribal law enforcement departments in California have deputation agreements with the federal Bureau of Indian Affairs, Office of Justice Services, which allows qualified tribal officers to become special commissioned federal officers authorized to enforce federal law on Indian lands in their jurisdiction.
(g) Legal status as a peace officer in California has been extended to a large number of persons under state law, including, but not limited to, the members of the University of California Police Department, certain employees of the Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Department of Parks and Recreation, the Department of Tax and Fee Administration, and the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, museum safety and security employees of the
California Science Center, police appointed the California Exposition and State Fair, and persons designated by a local agency as a park ranger. Tribes have been excluded from that designation.
(h) State law authorizes federal officers to exercise state peace officer arrest authority, and while some county sheriffs recognize tribal officers with a special commission as federal officer for purposes of that law, other sheriffs do not, or will not allow these officers to arrest offenders for violations of state law.
(i) While there are avenues for tribal officers to enforce state law on Indian lands, these options are limited, discretionary, and inconsistently applied across counties. While state law authorizes a county sheriff to deputize a tribal officer as a reserve or auxiliary deputy,
those agreements are often limited by the sheriff’s term in office and subject to termination at any time.
(j) Where state and county law enforcement departments have developed close working and cooperative relationships with the tribal law enforcement agencies, these relationships have resulted in greater public safety for both the non-Indian and Indian communities.
(k) State law establishing the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS) states that “the maintenance of law and order is, and always has been, a primary function of government,” and that “the state has an unmistakable responsibility to give full support to all public agencies of law enforcement,” and that the state’s responsibility “includes the provision of an efficient law enforcement
communications network available to all such agencies.” Indian tribes have not been considered public agencies for purposes of this statute, excluding them from CLETS access.
(l) Current entities with access to CLETS include sheriffs, city police departments, district attorneys, courts, probation departments, the California Highway Patrol, the Department of Justice, the Department of Insurance, the Employment Development Department, university, college, and school district police departments, fire department arson investigation units, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Despite this broad application of public agencies with access to CLETS, tribal courts and tribal police that operate within California’s borders do not have CLETS access.
(m) Without access to CLETS,
tribal police cannot receive, share, or update critical criminal record information, missing and unidentified persons files, protective order files, and violent persons files; all of which are critical to effective and thorough investigations of, and related to, missing and murdered Indigenous women and people, violence, and domestic violence on tribal lands.
(n) Without tribal access to CLETS, tribal courts and tribal law enforcement cannot enter domestic violence protective orders, emergency protective orders, or other restraining orders, limiting the ability of county and state law enforcement to protect tribal people. Tribal protective orders can only be entered into the Tribal Access Program and are only viewable by other law enforcement through National Crime Information Center, limited systems that do not give county or state law
enforcement access to the parameters of these protective orders. Because tribal law enforcement lack access to CLETS, they are unable to view the parameters of a CLETS protective order when they respond to calls for service in these matters. This lack of access to CLETS hampers state and county police officers from effectively protecting victims of violence and harassment, and creates a greater risk that these legal protective orders will not be enforced at the expense of the safety of women, children, and victims fleeing violence. This exacerbates the crisis of missing and murdered Indigenous women and people.
(o) In a pilot program involving the Sycuan Tribal Police Department, an agreement with the county allowed full access to CLETS by tribal officers. Because information is mutually shared between the tribe and local law
enforcement, both tribal police and sheriff’s deputies have access to each other’s data, including witness contact information, civilian contact with law enforcement, report narratives, and lists of stolen items. This mutual relationship of support, resource sharing, and communication between the tribe and local and state government has been beneficial to both agencies and critical to increasing public safety for the Sycuan Tribe, including an increase in crimes solved throughout the community.